Before you commit to anything, Transformance runs a no-cost pilot against your actual remittances, invoices, and ERP data. You see real extraction accuracy, real STP rates, and real cash-application results, not a vendor-controlled demo environment with curated inputs. If the numbers don't beat what you have today, you've lost nothing.
Vero connects to your existing ERP and ingests live payment data without displacing any current system. Your data stays in your VPC. Your AR team keeps working exactly as it works today while Vero matches payments alongside it. The parallel run is a bridge to cutover, not a permanent two-system state.
Most Transformance customers reach full O2C go-live in 4-8 weeks and see their first matched payments in 2-4 weeks. There's no multi-month services engagement, no template-building sprint, and no retraining ML models from scratch. Vero's vision-LLM architecture reads your remittances as-is and improves from day one, 100% invoice coverage within 24 hours of go-live.
Vero delivers >90% straight-through processing from the first week, reaching 85-95% STP by 90 days as persistent memory learns your customers' payment patterns. No format exceptions left unworked because a template was never built. No rule-engine maintenance between quarters.
Switching from Emagia? Book a call today and receive 50% off your onboarding. It is that easy, that secure, and that much better.
We went live in six weeks. The first month Vero matched more payments straight-through than our previous system had managed in a full year of configuration and tuning. We haven't looked back.
Head of AR Operations · Global Manufacturing Company
It depends on how far in you are and how much of the implementation cost is sunk. If you're still in the configuration or template-building phase, the switching cost is lower than it feels, Transformance requires no templates and no OCR rule sets, so the slate is genuinely clean. If you're fully live, a parallel pilot still makes sense: run Vero alongside Emagia for 30-60 days on the same remittance data and let STP and extraction numbers decide. Some teams choose to augment initially, keeping Emagia for deductions depth while replacing cash application, and consolidate once confidence is established. We support that transition path too.
Analyst recognition validates market presence, not extraction accuracy on your specific remittance data. Emagia's Gartner Visionary status is real and reflects a broad, established platform, but it was awarded to a 1998-era enterprise suite recently rebranded with an "agentic AI" orchestration layer on top of OCR and RPA. Transformance is natively built on vision LLMs with no legacy technical debt. The justification your CFO will find most compelling is a head-to-head pilot on your live remittances: if Transformance delivers >90% STP and goes live in 4-8 weeks versus a multi-month services engagement, the ROI conversation writes itself.
For complex CPG or retail trade-deduction environments, promotional agreement cross-referencing, proof-of-delivery validation at scale, Emagia's deductions engine has genuine depth we fully acknowledge. If high-volume, agreement-heavy trade deductions are your single biggest O2C pain point, Emagia is a legitimate contender in that specific dimension. Where Transformance wins decisively is cash application accuracy, STP velocity, forecasting, and deployment speed. A practical path: pilot Transformance on cash application first (where time-to-value is fastest and the LLM architecture gap is largest), evaluate deductions on real invoice data during that same window, and make a consolidated decision at 90 days, without any ERP cutover in the meantime.
Your data never leaves your VPC. Vero connects to your existing ERP via secure API and processes remittances inside your own cloud environment, there is no Transformance-managed data lake, no shared multi-tenant remittance store, and no requirement to export files to a third-party ingestion pipeline. The architecture you run during the parallel pilot is identical to the architecture you'd run at full cutover, so there is no "pilot mode" that changes post-signature.
Transformance supports major bank formats, ACH, wire, lockbox, BAI2, and SWIFT, and the standard ERP-native integration paths for SAP, Oracle, NetSuite, and Dynamics. We don't publish a 170-bank integration count today. If you have a specific regional bank, legacy lockbox format, or ISO 20022 variant that is business-critical, tell us before the pilot and we'll confirm coverage or give you an honest timeline. We'd rather disqualify ourselves on a specific format gap than have it surface after you've signed, the pilot is exactly the right place to find that out.